• Quantifying the Benefits of Improved Rolling of Chip Seals

    NCDOT Research Project Number: 2006-06

Executive Summary

  • This report presents an improvement in the rolling protocol for chip seals based on an evaluation of aggregate retention performance and aggregate embedment depth. The flip-over test (FOT), Vialit test, modified sand circle test, digital image processing technique, and the third-scale Model Mobile Loading Simulator (MMLS3) are employed to evaluate the effects of the various rolling parameters and to measure chip seal performance. The samples used to evaluate the chip seal rolling protocol were obtained directly from field construction. In order to determine the optimal rolling protocol, the effects of roller type, number of coverages, coverage distribution on the sublayers of a multiple chip seal (i.e., the split seal and triple seal), and rolling pattern are evaluated using the results of aggregate retention performance tests, the modified sand circle method, and the digital image process. It is found that two types of roller, the pneumatic tire roller and the combination roller, are recommended as the optimal rollers for the chip seal. In addition, it is found that the optimal number of coverages for the chip seal is three coverages. Moreover, the performance of the triple seal without coverage at the bottom layer does not affect the aggregate retention performance, although the split seal does require coverage at the bottom layer. Finally, it is found from the MMLS3 results that the delayed rolling time between the spreading of the aggregate and the initial rolling significantly affects the aggregate loss, and that the delayed rolling time is related to the aggregate moisture condition and the ambient temperature. Effects of different rolling patterns are investigated based on the delayed rolling time and roller speeds, and recommendations are developed for two- and three-roller scenarios.​


  
Researchers
  
Y. Richard Kim
  
Emily O. McGraw
  
Mustan Kadibhai, PE, CPM

Related Documents

Report Period

  • July 2005 - June 2007

Status

  • Complete

Category

  • Pavement, Materials and Maintenance

Sub Category

  • Pavement Performance

Related Links



Was this page helpful?